tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729562980132720815.post2515707536784089466..comments2024-03-22T02:27:30.009-05:00Comments on Royal World: Succession unaltered--for nowTheodore Harveyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16242452485576182841noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729562980132720815.post-30605095174657796722008-04-29T12:25:00.000-05:002008-04-29T12:25:00.000-05:00(Andrew but not Andrew Roberts)Roberts' column is ...(Andrew but not Andrew Roberts)<BR/><BR/>Roberts' column is not only uncharitable to Wilhelm II, it also doesn't follow the implications of his own argument. If the Princess Royal had been her mother's heir, it's very hard to believe the future Queen of the UK and the future King of Prussia would have wed in the first place. Therefore, no Wilhelm.Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00075284177370306762noreply@blogger.com