tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729562980132720815.post8914248656439595932..comments2024-03-22T02:27:30.009-05:00Comments on Royal World: The Reactionary DilemmaTheodore Harveyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16242452485576182841noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729562980132720815.post-31471925246170919752019-10-17T16:44:01.400-05:002019-10-17T16:44:01.400-05:00I don't disagree at all, but I think that supp...I don't disagree at all, but I think that supports what I was getting at, that by the 20th century traditional conservatism, or what was left of Christendom, was too weak to resist the revolutions.Theodore Harveyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16242452485576182841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7729562980132720815.post-28560090819161529572019-09-04T14:58:32.374-05:002019-09-04T14:58:32.374-05:00I'd argue in a different direction: the weaken...I'd argue in a different direction: the weakened and divided Christian patrician spirit was already waning by the time Bolshevism reared its ugly head. The Great War was due to these divisions. I'd have to think had Christendom been less divided, the Kaiser would have sent aid the the Czar when the revolution game. The great war, the October revolution, etc. weren't the cause of the fall of Christendom, they were enabled by her weakened state. Much like the second Vatican council didn't come out of nowhere (all those masonic theologians didn't just materialize in 1960), the enlightenment had been doing its damage for centuries. I blame Locke and Smith more than Lenin and Stalin. Aaron Traashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07438990965997991020noreply@blogger.com