I think the most popular name for European monarchs (defined herein 
as kings or emperors) has been Charles. Let's see: two kings of England 
& Scotland, ten kings of France, one king of Portugal, four kings of
 Spain, seven Holy Roman Emperors, one (beatified) Emperor of 
Austria-Hungary, nominally sixteen (actually ten) Kings of Sweden, two 
kings of Romania, one king of Württemberg. Did I miss anyone? Oh yes, 
there's Naples & Sicily which gets complicated because some kings 
ruled both with different numerals and then the last King Charles 
(VII/V) subsequently became III of Spain. But if you're ever in a 
situation where you have to guess the name of a European monarch, you 
have better odds with "Charles" than any other particular name.
Louis, especially after Louis IX was canonized, was extremely popular in
 France, going all the way up to XVIII (Woody Allen's character in 
"Small Time Crooks": "how high do the 'Louis's go? Anyway, it's a top 
Louis."), but in other countries, we have four Holy Roman Emperors, two 
kings of Bavaria, one king of Portugal, and one short-lived king of 
Spain. Not bad I suppose.
Edward unsurprisingly has been the most
 popular kingly name in England; the numbering only goes up to VIII, but
 there were additionally three Kings Edward before the Norman Conquest. 
But the name never really caught on on the Continent; just one king of 
Portugal.
Henry is another very important monarchical name; 
obviously, eight Kings of England. Four Kings of France, seven Holy 
Roman Emperors, four Kings of Castile.
We mustn't forget my own 
brother's name, William. Four kings of England (and God willing, one 
future), four kings of the Netherlands (though the present one insists 
on going by "Willem-Alexander"), two German Emperors, two kings of 
Württemberg.
Francis: two Kings of France, two Holy Roman 
Emperors, and two Kings of the Two Sicilies. (Of course now there's also
 the pope, but I'm not dealing with popes here.)
Ferdinand was 
the name of seven kings of Spain, three Holy Roman Emperors (a fourth 
was king of Bohemia & Hungary but predeceased his father so never 
became Emperor), two kings of the Two Sicilies, one Austrian Emperor, 
one king of Romania, one king of Bulgaria.
Philip: six kings of France, six kings of Spain (including the present one), the present king of Belgium.
Leopold: three kings of Belgium, two Holy Roman Emperors. 
Maximilian: two Holy Roman Emperors, two kings of Bavaria, one Emperor of Mexico.
Joseph: one king of Portugal, one dubious (Napoleonic) king of Spain, two Holy Roman Emperors.
Alexander: three Kings of Scotland, three Emperors of Russia, one King 
of Greece, one Prince of Bulgaria, two kings of Serbia/Yugoslavia 
(though the second did not use "II").
John: one king of England 
(not a great success), six kings of Portugal, two kings of France, one 
king of Saxony, one king of Denmark.
Frederick: three Kings of Prussia, nine kings of Denmark, three Holy Roman Emperors.
George: six Kings of Great Britain (III & IV were also kings of 
Hanover), one additional king of Hanover, one king of Saxony, two kings 
of Greece.
Peter: four kings of Aragon, five Kings of Portugal (the 4th of whom was 
also I of Brazil), two Emperors of Brazil, three Emperors of Russia, two
 kings of Serbia/Yugoslavia.
Otto: four Holy Roman Emperors, one king of Greece, one king of Bavaria.
Harold: two pre-Conquest kings of England, five kings of Norway (including the present one).
This isn't really in any sort of order anymore, is it?
Most other names seem to be associated primarily or exclusively with 
one monarchy (e.g. Christian in Denmark, Gustav in Sweden, James in 
Britain).
I'm just typing this, without doing too much research 
to refresh my memory, on a rainy afternoon for no reason really. Hope 
someone enjoys it.
Friday, August 26, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
3 comments:
I enjoyed it--I laughed, though, when you said it wasn't going in any order.
I suppose it makes sense that Charles should be the top name, given Charlemagne ("Charles the Great"): if I'm not mistaken, he is "Charles I" both by the reckoning of Kings of France and Holy Roman Emperors, is he not?
Charles the Magne should technically be Charles 0 of France, since there were 11 kings of fRance named Charles. No, really, count from Pepin the Short onwards, they skipped over a Charles when they numbered the Kings of France!
I've always that the French numbering for "Charles" seemed a little weird. Not as weird though as the Swedish where they simply made up the first six.
Post a Comment