I don't usually link to articles I don't like, but this one is too frustrating to ignore. It's like the writer feels guilty for
regretting the collapse of the Habsburg Empire at all, so contradicts
himself with baseless assertions, oversimplifications, and half-truths. The incoherent article might be summarized like this: "Yes,
Europe was better off when the Habsburgs ruled, but the Habsburgs
deserve absolutely no credit for that and what's happened since 1914 is all their fault anyway."
Since
Prince Philip Kiril of Prussia asked the British people's forgiveness
for his great-great-grandfather's role in the beginning of World War I a
century ago, perhaps the British and other Allied governments should ask for
_his_ forgiveness for their role in the republicanization of Europe--a
monumental tragedy from which Europe has never recovered and for which
Europeans, clinging to egalitarian and republican
lies, have never repented. That the 20th century would have been better
for everyone, including non-monarchists, if the Hohenzollerns,
Habsburgs, and Romanovs had remained on their thrones is so blindingly
obvious that it ought not to be controversial to say so. Republicanism
is Death, basically, and Europeans should never be allowed to forget
that.
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
That was a painful read. Why is it so hard for moderns to admit that the regimes during Europe's glory days were a good part of the cause of those days?
I stopped at "Europe's most embarrassing anachronism" in the subtitle.
Post a Comment